Friday, October 20, 2006

Paedos Beware! There May Be A Democrat Near You

I read in The Independent today that the Republican Party in America are running an unofficial smear campaign against Democrats with big leads in the run-up to the mid-term elections on November 7th, accusing several of them, bizarrely, of encouraging paedophilia in many and tenuous ways. What?! Yes. Paedophilia. And how are they encouraging it? By going on marches attended by paedos. Or by endorsing civil liberties organisations who have defended the right of NAMBLA (National American Man Boy Love Association), to talk complete bollocks in a democratic society (did you know kindly old owl-like Allen Ginsberg was in NAMBLA by the way?)

This is a hopeful sign for America. It is such an act of impotent desperation on the part of the Republicans to adopt these disreputable, sleazy tactics to defeat their (slightly) more liberal counterparts, it demonstrates beyond any doubt that the cause has been lost: these crazed evangelical dunces have lost the puritanical new white world they were trying to build, and in their grief they have turned in on themselves like murderers. But my God, suppose for a minute that these tactics work, and just enough voters fall for it to return just enough Republicans to keep a degree of power in the conservative camp? What choice to the Democrats have then but to climb down into the slimey pit and start doctoring photos to show George Bush having sex with animals?

1 comment:

Bruce Hodder said...

Isn't it? I don't know what impact it has over there, but over here it's this kind of dirty politics that causes voters to lose faith in the politicians, and not vote. That and--I suppose--the fact that the system as it is doesn't provide a genuine choice. Can you cast a vote against Iraq/ against Guantanamo on Nov 7th? All the political parties want Guantanamo to be shut down over here, but the Conservative Party, who are more or less the equivalent of the Republicans, won't be demanding a withdrawal of troops from Iraq if they get elected in '07 or '08 (I have a nasty feeling we may still be there). They shake their heads disapprovingly about the occupation, but what they actually want to happen now is anybody's guess. And they supported the invasion in the first place (when all sane people knew it was wrong).